in Search
1/3,124 members online
Immortality

reason

Radical Life Extension Requires Faster Computers

(Crossposted from Fight Aging!)

If radical life extension is to get underway within our lifetimes, this era must become a golden age, a true revolution in biotechnology. This golden age of biotechnology requires the development of faster computers - much, much faster computers.

the hype that followed the complete mapping of the human genome in 2000 is true: The 21st century really is turning out to be the golden age of biotech.

All that gene-sequencing and protein-mapping is going to take us into a brave new world of health where you can walk into your doctor's office, have your DNA sequenced, find out what diseases you're at risk for, and then ingest a single chemical compound mapped to your proteins that will help eliminate your risk.

You can see that happening already, albeit in relatively small (and relatively pricey) ways.

...

Second, all that demand from biotech is going to boost our supercomputing power the same way the space race helped spur the development of the mainframe computers that were revolutionary for their time.

New branches of science that most of us are unfamiliar with are about to become household words, or at least recognizable job prospects: genomics (the study of genes), proteomics (the study of proteins), biostatistics and bioinformatics (which create algorithms to help analyze biological data).

Biotech research centers are springing up everywhere from Brazil to Zimbabwe. The field, awash in pharmaceutical cash, is sucking in researchers, programmers, engineers, biologists, computer scientists - anyone whose career path comes close to meeting the needs of computing-driven biotech.

The more that scientists examine the genome and pinpoint the locations of certain ailments, the more numbers that supercomputers will have to crunch to find a cure.

Consider that it is only in recent years, now that computing power per dollar has really started to take off, that major progress has been made in long-standing fields such as cancer research, genetics and immunology. Without advances in processing power, and the tools of bioinformatics built atop this foundation, scientists would have no hope of dealing effectively with the sheer complexity of human biochemistry.

With tools, understanding, hard work and funding we will be increasingly able to tackle the details of degenerative aging: replace failing mitochondria; turn cancer into a manageable, chronic condition; remove toxic byproducts that accumulate inside and around your cells with age; repair the aging immune system; build replacement tissue from our own stem cells; and much more. Every problem has an answer, if only the resources are applied to find it.

We are fortunately to live in a time in which the possibility exists to engineer additional healthy decades of life. Let's not miss this chance at a longer and much more fascinating future: we should do our utmost to support the advance of medical technology.

Published Saturday, August 19, 2006 4:06 PM by reason

Comment Notification

Join or sign in to track comments

Comments

 

Mr. Farlops wrote on August 20, 2006 8:17 PM

Well, I'm doing my small part by donating my excess computer time to project Rosetta@Home:

http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/team_display.php?teamid=2578

 

JanessaVR wrote on August 21, 2006 5:02 PM

Mr. Farlops:  Had a look over their page.  I've thought about participating in these projects (no real interest in SETI, but this one hits closer to home).  Security/Privacy info seems a little scanty.  Know of any peer reviews of that?  Opening my home PC to perfect strangers...dicey.  Worthy cause, but hmmm...

Janessa

 

Mr. Farlops wrote on August 21, 2006 9:07 PM

Janessa,

I think there is little risk of this.

BOINC (The program that manages most of these scientific distributed computing projects.) is fully open source and all of the projects and data associated with it are totally open.  It's a high profile program associated with the University of Berkley and the various data crunching projects associated with it are associated with other major universities and some pharmaceutic and software companies as well. (I don't know if that's reassuring. I guess I'm trying to say that big league guys would at least try to be care with it.)

I did a brief search for security issues involving BOINC but, aside from the paranoid, the consensus seems to be that BOINC is safe. For example:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=BOINC+trojan

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=BOINC+virus

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=BOINC+keylogging

I personally haven't put a packet sniffer on the machines I run it on but I strongly doubt I'd find anything suspicious even if I did. I also run my home network and machines in a very secure way and so far, despite several years use with BOINC, SETI@Home, The Great Mersenne Prime search and so on, I've spotted no suspicious activity.

But If you're concerned and have multiple machines, perhaps you only just run it on a machine that you don't use for personal or secure information. Or only run it at work, if your boss or IT manager lets you.

I think you really have nothing to worry about.

 

EmbraceUnity wrote on August 24, 2006 9:33 AM

Of course Eliezer Yudkowsky always says that computing power is not the answer, and that it could be the enemy.  He would rather have more time to perfect friendly AI algorithms. The faster computers get, the easier it is for inefficient and possibly malevolent Artificial General Intelligences to be created.  Of course he is a believer in the "hard takeoff" scenario which I have yet to become convinced of.

 

Maestro949 wrote on August 24, 2006 1:27 PM

Check out the news about protein folding on the PS3.  Huge performance gains promised...

 

EschewObfuscation wrote on August 24, 2006 6:29 PM

AP, computing power quite obviously can't be the enemy if you don't run an AI on it. Of course, knowing people, that's not a good bet.

 

Mr. Farlops wrote on August 25, 2006 3:21 PM

How does this really have anything to do directly with AI? I thought Reason was just talking about data analysis.

I don't entirely agree that all of aging research needs the equivalent of Blue Brain. Maybe some questions do but, I think we can all play a small part in this research with Rosetta@home, Folding@home and so on.

Join or sign in to post a comment
Submit
Advertise | Help | Contact | About | Terms | Privacy | Copyright © 2007 Betterhumans | Powered by Community Server | Partners:
World Transhumanist Association Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies Immortality Institute Methuselah Mouse Prize Foresight Institute Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence Lifeboat Foundation